BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Keith Malone <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:07:09 -0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Hi Bob & All,

> Those
> beekeepers working with survivor queens see absolutely zero benefit in small
> cell.
>

Dr. Y. S. Kim (Yoon) was using feral survivors on large cell combs and failed
but refused to use the same type feral survivors on small cell combs. If he had
his results may have been different. Joe Waggle in Pennsylvania is using feral
bees in his area with greater success on small cells than other strains on small
cells without treatments. I can name other beekeepers doing good with feral bees
on small cell combs as well. Just because you say "Those
> beekeepers working with survivor queens see absolutely zero benefit in small
> cell." does not mean that those beekeepers even tried small cell combs. What
exactly do you mean by what you said here?

 . ..   Keith Malone, Chugiak, Alaska USA, http://www.cer.org/,
c(((([ , Apiarian, http://takeoff.to/alaskahoney/,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Norlandbeekeepers/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ApiarianBreedersGuild/

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2