Hervé Logé wrote:
>>This discussion (thanks to my error) has gone far
>>afield.
>
>
> I am afraid you are pushing me a step farther afield.

Your issue was 1% "contamination" by sugar syrup and that was more than
could be accepted.

It has moved from that to gross contamination and purposeful feeding to
make honey, which is well beyond 1% sugar syrup in honey. No one on this
list has supported that, but, if they feed for whatever reason, are
being painted with that brush.


Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::