BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Computer Software Solutions Ltd <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Sep 2001 22:27:04 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Hello All

Frankly I am at a loss to understand what must really be done when mites
resistant to Bayvarol/Apistan are discovered.

If mites are resistant to Bayvarol are they resistant to Apistan?

If the answer to the above question is YES then must we not use a control
which is neither of the above?

And if that be the case, then surely the control we must now use must be
more effective than the now failed control?

Does this not then point to Coumaphos?

And if it does not, then why did we not use the other control (not
Coumaphos) before the resistance to Bayvarol/Apistan emerged?

I shall be glad of input.

Sincerely

Tom Barrett
Dublin

ATOM RSS1 RSS2