BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Slade <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:41:44 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
 
In a message dated 20/11/2006 12:37:30 GMT Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Conversely in some wasp species - particularly those with closely  
related workers - policing was slack and nearly half the workers laid  
eggs. When workers were not closely related they policed each other  
more strictly.
From issue 2576 of New Scientist magazine, 01 November  2006, page 16




This is elucidated the following week in issue 2577 where, in an article  
headed 'Survival of the Nicest' its author Lee Alan Dugatkin explores altruism.  
He refers to a mathematical theory for its evolution devised by Bill Hamilton  
and now known as Hamilton's Rule.  It is a simple equation with 3  variables: 
the cost of altruism to the altruist (c), the benefit that a  recipient of 
altruism receives (b) and their genetic relatedness (r).
 
The Rule is that natural selection favours altruism when r x b >  c.
 
Chris

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2