BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"john f. mesinger" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 May 2000 16:41:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
        It just shows what happens when one speculates from observations to
causes that are unknown. The only thing I did think I knew was that queens'
shrink and expand abdomens at different periods in their lives.
        Following another suggestion, I sampled the spacing of a rod style
queen excluder I used to use:  4mm in every case.  Then I measured all of
the spaces in the queen excluder I have used several years. Every one is
3mm wide.  The workers came through fast and she was not far behind - twice!
        She may look anorexic but she laid two beautiful full frames of
brood before I captured her and she is now laying brood for children's
delight  in her observation hive.
        So I am still convinced that standard sized queen excluders will
not work with every queen - some are just different

John F. Mesinger
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2