BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:52:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
>  Beekeepers who did not frequently replace their queen were 18 times more likely to have high winter losses (more than 10% of the colonies per apiary).

Fair enough, but this was a scientific study which factored many variables, and nailed this one thing as most significant. Annual requeening has long been recommended (100 years or more). The question is whether it matters to you to keep individual colonies alive for multiple seasons, for whatever reason -- or not. 

Annual requeening is essentially having brand new colonies in all the equipment, but instead of starting from scratch with packages, you start with a new queen and the bees and brood from the old one. It's an intensive management scheme. 

It's long been known that there are many styles of keeping bees ranging from very intensive, where one tries to make every hive a winner, to extensive where one tries to keep as many colonies as possible, and not focus too much on the average yield or survival rate. Just different ways to get to the same goal: making a profit with bees. 

There are also other goals, which have nothing to do with cost/benefit ratios. Depends what you are after

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2