BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:26:13 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
> As per the neonics, I haven't had time to thoroughly look at the results, 
> but I did look at Imidacloprid.  The imidacloprid results show that  only 
> 1% of the wax samples, 2.9% of the pollen samples, and 0% or none of  the 
> bees had detectable levels.  That makes it hard to argue that this 
> chemical constitutes a major problem to bees in the U.S.

Can we assume that the tests included a check for metabolites?

For that matter, what do we know about the breakdown products of these 
products? 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L

ATOM RSS1 RSS2