BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Yarnell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Jun 2002 20:02:27 -0700
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (29 lines)
Before you do send a letter, might I suggest that you look up the bill and
see whether it's an extension of the loan program, funding the research
labs, or just what.  Many of us did write asking that the research
programs be continued pointing out the percentage hive losses to
parasites and pesticides.

If your letter gets it wrong, it's a matter of the pot calling the kettle
black.


On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Chuck Wettergreen wrote:

> The first story on the Saturday (6-15-02) ABC evening news
> concerned the "pork" hidden in the bill before congress to
> establish the Homeland Security Department. The reporter went
> through a laundry list ... and ended up with, "and
> that perennial favorite, the honeybee subsidy".

...

> Anyway, I fired off an e-mail to ABC News questioning their
> reporting, and maybe you all should too.

---------------
Richard Yarnell, SHAMBLES WORKSHOPS | No gimmick we try, no "scientific"
Beavercreek, OR. Makers of fine     | fix we attempt, will save our planet
Wooden Canoes, The Stack(R) urban   | until we reduce the population. Let's
composter, Raw Honey                | leave our kids a decent place to live.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2