BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Peter L. Borst" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Feb 2008 19:58:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Bob Harrison wrote:

>> The application rates for neonicotinoid insecticides are *much
lower* than older, traditionally used insecticides.
>
>The above statement has little to do with the issue but I am sure
impressed the uninformed person.

Nicely put, Bob. I emphasized the words *much lower* because this is a
very strong selling point for imidacloprid. It is much safer for the
*people* exposed to the insecticide. Especially attractive to
applicators is pre-treated seed, since they don't have to handle the
chemicals at all.

I understand that as a beekeeper you are focused on the potential
damage to bees, but all insecticides present a risk to bees. One also
has to weigh the risk to the applicators, to non-target organisms and
to consumers. If Gaucho-treated corn and sunflowers are toxic to bees,
maybe beekeepers need to keep their bees away from them. Not every
location is a "good location".

-- 
Peter L. Borst
Danby, NY  USA
42.35, -76.50
http://picasaweb.google.com/peterlborst

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2