BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Cushman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:08:30 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Hi all

Dennis said...

> New World Carniolans from Strachan.

> Carniolans have been historically classified as a larger bee.

I hope that by using the two statements close together that you are not
implying that NWC are a 'larger bee'.

I have every respect for the NWC and their originator, but they do not
occupy the same range of cell sizes that the European Carniolans do. The
work I am doing is far from complete, but early indications are that there
is a difference of  0.2 mm - 0.3 mm in the average cellsize of the two
strains... with the NWC being the smaller.

0.2 mm - 0.3 mm may be a small difference to those that are used to
measuring in inches, but it is a 'significant difference' when applied to
the size of a cell.

Those that have not yet looked at the work Dennis is doing can see it on...
http://www.geocities.com/usbwrangler/obs2.htm

We need more beekeeper with the time and dedication to do work like Dennis
is doing.


Best Regards & 73s, Dave Cushman... G8MZY
Beekeeping and Bee Breeding Website
http://website.lineone.net/~dave.cushman

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2