BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:03:35 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
>So the apparent takeaway from this and the "Contradictory conclusions" thread is that any breeding program does need to have a fairly sequestered mating area, wherein the drones/patrilines can be more tightly controlled. If not on the level of Dartmoor, then at the very least with the kind of regional "drone flooding" that Randy described.

We are in an area with a fairly high density of beekeepers and colonies with very mixed genetics!  We use drone flooding as our land (an acre) is bordered by woodland on two sides and some good trees on the other sides.  The land for the mating apiary also slopes north to south so gives quite an enclosed feel.  A.m.m. tends to mate close to home.

But there is another aspect that has not been mentioned - culling.  We raise more queens than we need and cull the undesirable ones.

Using these simple techniques we were able to virtually eliminate bad temper - a primary aim - within two seasons.  We even made a huge difference in just the first season.

Best wishes

Peter 
52°14'44.44"N, 1°50'35"W

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2