BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Julian O'Dea <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:10:54 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Dave Hamilton referred to my online paper at:

http://naturalscience.com/ns/articles/01-13/ns_jdo.html

and asked:

" Quite a few experiments have tagged the attendants from the dance and
watched them arrive at the food.  Why would this not demonstrate
communication?

What about the mechanical bee .. it was able to recruit "


Julian O'Dea: The tagging experiments could be explained
by odour communication. The mechanical bee experiments
have been criticised statistically in the following
paper:

Wenner, A.M., D.E. Meade and L.J. Friesen. 1991. Recruitment,
search behavior, and flight ranges of honey bees. Am. Zool.
31:768-782.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2