BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
BusyKnight <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Mar 1996 18:14:59 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
>Roy wrote:
>there is some work a foot to get the law changed...
And some work a foot to keep the law just as it is or even
expand it!
 
>Now comes the hard part , getting enough beekeepers to
>stand up and be counted.
Well, a lot of beekeepers and queen breaders ARE being
counted. And they want the importation ban kept in place.
 
Take for instance, the American Beekeeping Federation.
I got a mailing from them (I'm NOT a member & sure won't
bee now) that outlined their basic "planks" and I'm sure
most people already know this but they (as an 'official'
stance of their organization) are strongly against allowing
the importation of queens and/or bee semen.
 
Needless to say, I was taken back a little.  And I can't
fully understand this position taken by such a national
organization.  Can anyone explain this to me?  (I did note
that several of their leaders were queen breeders, is there
a tie here?)
 
BusyKnight
Dallas, TX
 
 
 
 
BusyKnight
Dallas, TX
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2