BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
lloyd spear <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 6 Jul 2003 08:25:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
"All the bee supply houses think replacing comb is a great idea! With honey
prices up replacing comb might be a excellent investment for the beekeeper."

What do they tell us beekeepers about the concentration of fluvalinate and
coumaphous in the foundation?  Do they know?  Early this year I had occasion
to have some tests made of wax sold for brood foundation and the
contamination levels were very high.  A friend shared a copy of the lab
results with the USDA folks and they said "what else is new"....they are
well aware of the general level of residuals.

BTW, similar tests ran on comb honey foundation (presumably made only from
capping wax) showed almost no level of residuals.


Lloyd
Lloyd Spear, Owner Ross Rounds, Inc.
Manufacturers of Ross Rounds Comb
Honey Equipment, Sundance Pollen Traps
and Custom Printer of Sundance Labels.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2