BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:16:48 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Ruary Rudd wrote:

> Could the ranges  then define the difference between the two species, thus
> preventing the subjective assessments so far heard in this question of
> species identification.

This is the point that I made when I wrote:

'Perhaps the ratio of their dimensions, width and depth, are the significant
factor.'

So far, I have not seen any numerical data for the two species.  When varroa
first arrived here we were told 1.1mm by 1.6mm, but so far no definitive
data to distinguish Vj from Vd seems to have been provided.  Whilst I have
still not had the time (and will not have the time for a couple of weeks) to
measure the samples from Kerala and the UK, cursory examination shows a
considerable variation in the proportions of the carapace.  However, the
ventral structure seems much more consistent, with Vd having a much broader
ventral plate compared with Vj.

Peter Edwards
[log in to unmask]
www.stratford-upon-avon.freeserve.co.uk/

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2