BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:05:43 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>>>The CHC did not vote in their resolution to have all non-registered
formic acid application off the market in two years as indicated in NOD's
post.<<<
>
> NOD did not bring or have any resolutions presented at
> CHC.  Indeed, only delegates can bring resolutions, so
> this is impossible.

No one suggested that NOD made a motion.  The first statement is correct.

Actually CHC just routinely asked for an extension of formic use.

2 years is the usual extension period for this sort of thing, as those of us
who fought the border closure know well.

The usual process, for regulations under observation, is to extend two
years, then -- if conditions have not changed -- another two, and another
2...

I hope the impression here is not that NOD is under attack.  We all
appreciate NOD's efforts to make formic treatment simple and safe.  We do
not, however, agree that approval for other uses should be curtailed in
favour of only NOD's product.

allen
A Beekeeper's Diary: http://www.honeybeeworld.com/diary/

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2