Kevin Sutton wrote Re: Lara St. John's now notorious cover: >"...That I object to the Ls.J cover is not a product of any desire to >be a thought policeman. It is me desire to see things presented in good >taste, and in a way which does not so much as imply that children are being >exploited. When I first saw this cover, I guessed that it was an attempt to cover up a CD of unremarkable music. I since have heard that it contains some really excellent playing and the next time it shows up in the used CD bin, I think I might give it a try. What never crossed my mind, however, was that this was a case of pseudo-kiddy porn. Ms St. John is an attractive young woman but there is no reason to assume from the cover that she is less than legal age for posing behind a violin, whatever that may be. Maybe I'm jaded, but it's hard to see why anyone found this picture particularly shocking. John Parker Tucson, Arizona