Steve Schwartz wrote: >I've actually gone back to read and reread what Bernard Sherman >actually wrote. I had been relying on what people told me he wrote - >usually a very bad idea. Yes, I don't remember the list member who "misrepresented" Mr. Sherman's comments, but I am a little upset that a fellow list member would purposely "abuse" another's comments for personal advantage. The result is that a few people, myself included, became critical of a man who deserved no such treatment. It was in bad form, and I do hope that, in the future, list members will accurately portray the themes of another writer - it's very easy to do; the opposite is dishonest. Don Satz [log in to unmask]