Return-Path: <>
Received: from rly-za02.mx.aol.com (rly-za02.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.98]) by
air-za01.mail.aol.com (v56.14) with SMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:22:28
-0500
Received: from imo18.mx.aol.com (imo18.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.8])
by rly-za02.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
with ESMTP id VAA24539 for <[log in to unmask]>;
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:22:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost)
by imo18.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0)
with internal id VAA14377;
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:22:27 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:22:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: library.unmed.edu: host not
found)
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
The original message was received at Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:21:38 -0500 (EST)
from root@localhost
*** ATTENTION ***
An e-mail you sent to an Internet destination could not be delivered.
The Internet address is listed in the section labeled:
"----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----".
The reason your e-mail could not be delivered is listed in the section
labeled:
"----- Transcript of Session Follows -----".
The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could
not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a
general translation for other e-mail servers.
Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail
administrator or Postmaster at that destination.
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[log in to unmask]>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 <[log in to unmask]>... Host unknown (Name server:
library.unmed.edu: host not found)
----- Original message follows -----
Received: from [log in to unmask]
by imo18.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id 3QCa020554
for <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:21:37 +1900 (EST)
From: [log in to unmask]
Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:21:37 EST
To: [log in to unmask]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: EZZO'S CLASS TAUGHT IN HOSPITAL HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 226
i'm new to this so please bear with me.I"m a new l.c. at the hospital i work
at.In south florida[yes the weathers great, sorry] . anyways I work in the
NICU and as we generally tend to stay to ourselves in that dept. I found out
quite by accident that part of our hospitals' prenatal education options our
lucky parents can attend a parenting course called BABYWISE. For a fee of
course. It is not taught by anyone on staff at the hospital but is taught at
the hospital and in case the parents foget anything they were taught they get
a book to take home. This hospital just spent big bucks to train 6RNS to
become IBCLCs, and claim to be pro breast-feeding. When I questioned the LDRP
educator about this program she could see no reason to get rid of it. Did I
mention that this same person is an IBCLC? Scary huh?
Well now for my big problem I need documentation to support my case against
offering babywise at the hospital, something from the AAP , Real doctors ,
etc would be great. Im having a meeting with the higher-ups soon and need all
the ammo I can get. anyone? any suggestions? thank-you in advance
gina in florida