From: [log in to unmask] Return-path: <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: LLL Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:00:46 EST Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit After I posted, I had some doubts that I was very clear about my point, and I guess I was not. (First time jitters) I think the first point is true--for an organization to be effective, they need to know what the public thinks of it. If someone shuts down to what you are saying (and thus will continue to think that there is something weird and perverse about a 3-yr old nursing) just because you have mentioned LLL, well, it is a problem. Okay, some people is not the public, but I have experienced it from doctors and other breastfeeding mothers, among other relatively "enlightened" types. I've found myself playing down my connection to LLL in order to say what I need to say and be heard. It's tough enough without establishing an "us against the world" persona that turns people off so they do not listen. My other point. that they are more diverse than I always imagine, is really where they shine...I am not an image consultant, but I think they could really make themselves more appealing on this note. Maybe I've come think too much like a fundraiser (yikes!) but every piece one sends out is a chance for educating, and LLL looks unappealing in a sort of outdated way. A lot can be done with new graphic design. I speak as someone who works with chronically underfunded arts organizations, so I understand the lack of funds issue. As I've heard many Lactnetters say, its baby steps that make the difference. We can not ignore that the world is changing--and is all change so bad? You may think it is shallow to expect updated graphics to make a difference, but think of how many "products" make themselves over to be the sexy thing, and it works. Breastfeeding is hip! Why not? Beat those d*mn formula companies at their own game! Thank you for the opportunity to clarify my point, Robyn