Is it just me, or did I just watch an entire 20-20 segment on Breasts that never once mentioned that they have a biological function which is intragrally related to the definition of being a mammal? The entire "expose" was on breast size from a cosemetic perspective and how it damages women's psychies. Ughhhh...not to mention the fact that they failed to include any physical health aspects of breasts...not breast cancer, breastfeeding, or even how breast augmentation can affect erectile tissue for that matter. And, if we really want to get petty about the fact that this was an incredibly shallow piece, they didn't discuss the shape of breasts. Remember the LN string on pendulous breasts? You can have lots of volume, but your breasts point toward the floor (but not a one of 20-20's interviewees or models had these). My DH's comment...what do expect in 10 minutes? Just wait till I get to turn that comment around on him... : )Chris Hafner-Eaton, PhD, MPH, CHES, IBCLC email: [log in to unmask] : ) : )HSR & Health Educational Consultant voice/fax: 541 753 7340 : ) : )LLLLLLLLLLLLL**CHANGE THE WORLD, NURTURE A CHILD!**LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL : )