Allen Dick 546-2588 wrote, > > To my knowledge there are no other places for such a discussion to take > place. I enjoyed the enthusiasm shown in the few responses I did read - > and I approve personally. Hello, there is sci.agriculture.beekeeping. That is a USENET newsgroup for those not bored to tears by my pro USENET posts. Funny, I've actually seen Allen post there. > Perhaps we need another bee list. One for *serious* ;) discussion. And > one for light chatter. Unfortunately I don't (yet) have the software to > set up such a thing. Maybe soon, we can split the list and have a > chatter group and a group which only receives summaries and bulletins. Sci.agriculture.beekeeping was created for anecdotal beekeeping dialog. I don't think with bee-l, socinsect list and sci.agriculture.beekeeping that yet another list is necessary. Why not try what's already in place. After all, it _is_ in the faq... Adam -- ____________________________________________________________________________ Adam Finkelstein Price Hall Entomology VA Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24001-0325 [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________