I have seen this same topic discusses on C18-L (eighteenth century discussion) and Aegeanet (pre-Classical Aegean), the latter which was wide-ranging and quite comprehensive. There seemed to be two kinds of information that are most commonly "lifted" from the net: ideas and the latest field research. While it might be most rigorous to wait for the San Diego Presideo reports to be published in peer-review. That could take some time, some sites, as you know, years. Half of what appears on Aegeanet is preliminary announcements of sites not yet published. While it is always a good idea to get back with whomever posted to confirm that what they have said is accurate, why not mention the lastest information (with proper citation) in your research when you have it availible. Kenneth Gauck [log in to unmask]