Ramon Khalona wrote: >Here's the playlist: > >... >B8: D. Russell Davies/Bruckner Orch. Linz (BOL, 2002) >... I will try to make it, although not the whole thing. I gave you incorrect info a prior e- mail. It was Soudant, not Stenz who did the Bruckner 4. Would you like to substitute it for Kertesz, since probably no one in California has heard it? Where can i obtain the D.R. Davies 8? Alan Stone Return-path: <[log in to unmask]> Received: (qmail 81430 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 22:20:16 -0000 Received: from home.ease.lsoft.com (209.119.1.31) by ezera.pair.com with SMTP; 6 Aug 2003 22:20:16 -0000 Received: from home (home.ease.lsoft.com) by home.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:19:30 -0400 Return-path: <[log in to unmask]> Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net by home.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:19:30 -0400 Received: from KAYNSTEVE ([68.212.103.167]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with SMTP id <20030806221913.PRBG27767.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@KAYNSTEVE>; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:19:13 -0400 From: "Steve Schwartz" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Howells and Stevens Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 17:19:24 -0500 Status: O This message was originally submitted by [log in to unmask] to the CLASSICAL list at HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM. If you simply forward it back to the list, using a mail command that generates "Resent-" fields (ask your local user support or consult the documentation of your mail program if in doubt), it will be distributed and the explanations you are now reading will be removed automatically. If on the other hand you edit the contributions you receive into a digest, you will have to remove this paragraph manually. Finally, you should be able to contact the author of this message by using the normal "reply" function of your mail program. ----------------- Message requiring your approval (10 lines) ------------------ Stephen E. Bacher responded to me: >>The work answers the question of whether a non-believer can write a >>successful sacred work resoundingly in the affirmative. > >Hasn't that been already answered by RVW's work? Yes and yes. Also, probably by Verdi as well. Steve Schwartz