allen dick wrote: > I'd be interested in the mean and the variation, and the probability > that -- somewhere in the massive amounts of product shipped -- there > might be harmful levels. I thought the same. But it really does not matter if the level is harmless or greater than what was found. It is a banned antibiotic and is being used somewhere in the beekeeping business in China. We are not dealing with science and any rational decision here. Look at the current scare over arsenic in drinking water. It also is in the ppm/ppb ranges but that is not the issue. It is arsenic and arsenic kills. The levels being discussed have little science but lots of emotion. Recent info says that in small doses it is beneficial, but that does not matter. I would hate to be a commercial distributor of honey and find that Chinese honey was deemed OK because the levels of a banned antibiotic were only trace levels. Antibiotics are not supposed to be in honey no matter if ppm or ppb. No one would buy any honey. Remember Alar? Bill Truesdell Bath, Maine :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: -- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info --- ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::