Does evidence-based practice mean that we have to understand exactly *how* something works? Or just that it does, and is supported by reputable literature? There's a number of studies listed on the National Center for Homeopathy at http://www.homeopathic.org/research.htm They might explain it a little more clearly than I could (I'm not a homeopath, nor a biochemist). I have seen homeopathy work amazingly well for my own family, clients (no, I did not prescribe it), and in animals. Morgan Kennedy Henderson, IBCLC Wellesley, MA On 1/2/03 12:03 AM, "Automatic digest processor" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 18:15:20 -0800 > From: Kate Hallberg <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: lac caninum > > with all due respect, how is the diluted (and > succussed) milk of a dog going to dry up milk? Please > explain in terms that this biochemist can understand. > > > kate- jumping in, after discussing this off-list with > people concerned about evidence based practice *********************************************** To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest) To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet All commands go to [log in to unmask] The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM) mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to: http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html