Elihu L. Sussman ([log in to unmask]) wrote: >I am new to the group so time i chimed in. I have the kempff set and >generally like it. However it should be noted that there are performances >he recorded that are not in the set that are better. For example, #23 >was recorded earlier in mono and is a much more vigorous performance. >Not to say that the complete set performance is bad I'm not sure exactly what you have, but kempff recorded two complete cycles: mono in the mid 50s and stereo in the mid 60s. The earlier cycle is generally reckoned to be better. Deryk Barker [log in to unmask]