Vivien Leong wrote: >I always wonder why is it Mozart's music and not Bach's I can't answer your question. I must say that I think it's kind of ridiculous how Mozart's music has suddenly acquired a reputation for being good for the mind, and how prevalant it has become in children's stores. It's a sign of our times how people generally are shallow enough to follow marketing trends, without having a true interest in Mozart's music. I picture people buying Mozart tapes for their babies, as if they were buying baby food. Being somewhat of an outsider who actually is passionate about classical music, I sometimes feel resentfull how classical music is processed and chopped up and presented in small "stage 1 baby food" pieces that our shallow culture can digest. To get back to your question, I think it is legitimate. Can a baby tell the difference between Haydn and Mozart? I don't think so. Between Mozart and Bach -- maybe sometimes. Mike