Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >NOW I understand. RC simply reports a cultural fact. We may praise or >deplore the fact (both of which are a waste of time), if we like. This I agree with... As much as I would love to hear radio stations play a LOT more Ravel or Poulenc, both of whom I feel are just as tunefully "pushable" as anything by Mozart (which I would personally love to hear a lot LESS of on the radio)... radio stations just *don't*. But if new CM radio listeners do hear something on the medium that they do connect with, even if it is *just* the most standard of the standard rep, at least they've gotten their foot in the door. Albie