Mats Norrman ([log in to unmask]) wrote: >I have seen this reference that Urbanek Mahler 1 is same as Nanut Mahler 1 >before, but as far as I am concerned the rumour stems from a misprint in a >web-catlogue, which had a coverphoto of Urbaneks Mahler 1, which according >to the surrounding text was sold as "Nanut Mahler 1". A rather funny sort >of misprint I think. There has been considerable discussion of Nanut and his recordings on the Mahler list. I don't think there's any doubt that these are the same performance. Deryk Barker [log in to unmask]