As opposed to the past weeks discussion of archaeology saints? > -----Original Message----- > From: MacLeod, Heather [SMTP:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Thursday, 14 December, 2000 1:49 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: the end of the world as we know it? > > "historic" or "historical"....I agree with Tim, I do feel the thread > digressing somewhat from the whole HISTARCH vein. > Just my 2 cents worth... > Heather > > > ---------- > > From: Austin, Stephen P > > SWF[SMTP:[log in to unmask]] > > Reply To: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY > > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 1:01 PM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Re: the end of the world as we know it? > > > > "Historical Archaeology" Tim. That was decided at the first SHA meeting > > ;-) > > > > Stephen P. Austin > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Timothy K. Perttula [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 11:41 AM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Re: the end of the world as we know it? > > > > > > In a message dated 12/14/00 11:39:20 AM, [log in to unmask] writes: > > > > << Are you mad? We should be thinking about how long umemployment will > > stretch > > under the RepubliKans. >> > > > > We ought to be thinking about something having to do with historic > > archeology...? > >