LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Akre <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 1996 11:56:35 CET
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
          Pat Gorman's splendid post describing the "daily realities"
          faced in the WIC program puts the onus for artificial
          feeding squarely where it belongs: on the dominant
          sociocultural environment and the values it conveys. WIC's
          infant-formula handout--US$492 million worth in 1992 and
          US$546 million in 1993--at first glance may look like
          another example of government largesse gone wrong.
          Fortunately, the news from WIC does not end here. There is
          another dimension to this free formula distribution: meeting
          the nutritional needs of *today's* babies artificially with
          the best breast-milk substitute available while
          *simultaneously* investing in meeting the needs of
          *tomorrow's* babies naturally. Thus the US$8 million WIC has
          budgeted annually since 1988 for breast-feeding
          promotion--this was increased to over US$21 million in
          1994--is beginning to pay off in terms of a higher
          percentage of change in decisions to breast-feed among
          mothers served by WIC than among mothers generally. Nancy
          Schweers, as no doubt Pat Gorman, could provided additional
          detail in this regard.

          Jim Akre, Nutrition, WHO, Geneva

ATOM RSS1 RSS2