Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 18 Jan 1996 11:56:35 CET |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Pat Gorman's splendid post describing the "daily realities"
faced in the WIC program puts the onus for artificial
feeding squarely where it belongs: on the dominant
sociocultural environment and the values it conveys. WIC's
infant-formula handout--US$492 million worth in 1992 and
US$546 million in 1993--at first glance may look like
another example of government largesse gone wrong.
Fortunately, the news from WIC does not end here. There is
another dimension to this free formula distribution: meeting
the nutritional needs of *today's* babies artificially with
the best breast-milk substitute available while
*simultaneously* investing in meeting the needs of
*tomorrow's* babies naturally. Thus the US$8 million WIC has
budgeted annually since 1988 for breast-feeding
promotion--this was increased to over US$21 million in
1994--is beginning to pay off in terms of a higher
percentage of change in decisions to breast-feed among
mothers served by WIC than among mothers generally. Nancy
Schweers, as no doubt Pat Gorman, could provided additional
detail in this regard.
Jim Akre, Nutrition, WHO, Geneva
|
|
|