LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kim Balzer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Mar 1997 19:15:48 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Regarding the recent posts on extended nursing - I think that even in
LLL/LC/BF advocate circles breastfeeding is only accepted in an older child
until a certain age. It has been my personal experience that this age seems
to be about 4 years. If the mother/child dyad continues to nurse after
that, it does raise some eyebrows.

This is just my opinion/observation. I am personally nursing my youngest
child who is 6.1 years old. I only know a very few people who have nursed
this long. I am reluctant to mention it to many people (wow, now over 1000
people on Lactnet know!) because of people's reactions. I am thrilled to
hear that Kathy Dettwyler's research indicates that humans were really
designed to nurse until 6-7 years old.

Even books supportive of long-term nursing like "Mothering Your Nursing
Toddler" don't really speak much to nursing a child over five. How many of
us, even though we are BF advocates, are totally comfortable with the idea
of a 6 or 7 year old still nursing?

Just my .02.
***********************************************************************
Kim Balzer, LLLeader, Area Communications Coordinator LLL of N.CA/HI
The Milkie Way, Breastpump Rentals/Sales, Breastfeeding Accessories
Sebastopol, CA USA
mailto:[log in to unmask]     http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Plains/9068
***********************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2