LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Catherine Watson Genna, IBCLC (by way of Kathleen Bruce <[log in to unmask]>)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Mar 2000 17:11:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
From Catherine Watson Genna, IBCLC, here is the start of our second
discussion for Journal Club.  Please feel free to jump in and start the
discussion of this article, and feel free to bring in the companion article
by Lisa Amir MD, et al, as well, from the same JHL issue.

Kathleen


"The Treatment of Staphyloccocus Aureus Infected Sore Nipples: A
Randomized Comparative Study." by Verity Livingtone, MBBS, FCFP, IBCLC
and L. Judy Stringer, MBBS, MRCGP, IBCLC, Journal of Human Lactation,
15(3), 1999.

        The authors suspected a link between delayed healing of cracked nipples
and Staph aureus infection.  Women presenting with cracked nipples, but
without mastitis, had their nipple lesions  cultured.  Those positive
for Staph aureus were randomized to one of four treatment groups:
- individualized bf technique assistance from an LC.
- topical mupiricin ointment (Bactroban) and bf technique assistance.
- topical fusidic acid ointment and bf technique assistance.
- beta lactamase resistant systemic antibiotics (dicloxacillin or
erythromycin 500mg/qid/10d) and bf technique assistance.

        Women were re-evaluated in 7 days, and nipples assessed as
better/resolved, no change, and worse based on pain and skin
appearance.  Any cellulitis, mastitis, or fever was considered a
treatment failure, and oral antibiotics were prescribed.

        Results: a large proportion of each of the non-systemic treatments
failed to improve, and a significant proportion progressed to mastitis.
79% of women in the oral antibiotic group improved and only 5%
worsened.  Fusidic acid outperformed mupiricin, but only a minority of
women were improved in one week with both topical treatments.  Optimal
technique alone showed improvement in only 9% of women in this study,
35% of them worsened over one week, and 30% progressed to mastitis.  In
all, 25% of mothers treated non-systemically progressed to mastitis, but
only 5% of those given oral antibiotics developed mastitis.  The authors
recommend that sore, cracked nipples be clinically diagnosed as impetigo
vulgaris, and be treated with systemic antibiotics for a minimum of 10
days until the skin is fully healed, while improving breastfeeding
technique to prevent added trauma or friction to the nippples.

        Other interesting points:
- 5 women in this study reported deep, radiating, burning breast pain
and episodic vasospasm of the nipples, unrelated to immediate sucking.
The authors attribute this to both repetitive gumming of the nipple and
the S. aureus infection.
- The advice to not use soap on the nipples contradicts hygeinic
adjuncts to impetigo treatment.
- 17% of the moms with S. aureus infections had poorly graspable
nipples.
- 10% of their infants had tongue tie, and 12% had significant
retrognathia.

--
Catherine Watson Genna, IBCLC  New York City  mailto:[log in to unmask]

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2