I am not (now) a subscriber to REDBOOK.  When I did subscribe, I felt it
was less a magazine for families and one more for very young marrieds.  (so
much for my orientation and what I perceived to be theirs!)  :-)

Anyway, my take on the cover is that is was especially nice because you
could tell the baby was NOT a newborn!  Is this a new thought--that babies
older than newborn breastfeed?!  Anyway, for all of you who are subscribers
and who write to Redbook, please congratulate them on recognizing that
breastfeeding occurs longer than a few weeks!  I thought the cover art was
lovely, not at all likely to offend.  It had everything--including just
enough cleavage to encourage people to read inside the cover to find out
what was REALLY going on in that picture!  :-)

     mailto:[log in to unmask]

"We are all faced with a series of great opportunities brilliantly
disguised as impossible situations."
Kathleen G. Auerbach,PhD, IBCLC (Ferndale, WA USA) [log in to unmask]
WEB PAGE: http://www.telcomplus.net/kga/lactation.htm
LACTNET archives http://library.ummed.edu/lsv/archives/lactnet.html