LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kathleen G. Auerbach" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Dec 1995 20:49:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
In reply to Judy Dunlap's question about the policy of magazines to charge
for reprinting copies.  The answer is YES--this is standard policy. And
whether for a for-profit or not-for-profit group makes no difference. Keep
in mind that making such copies is not cheap and virtually all publishing
houses have to at least recoup their costs. Even if they do not do the
copying, they will charge. There are several reasons for same, but the
bottom line is staying in business.  The cost that Scientific American
charged was actually not all that high, insofar as the artilce in question
was longer than 3 pages and they were going to charge on $3/copy, less than
$1/page.





Def. of LC service: "We are all faced with a series of great opportunities
brilliantly disguised as impossible situations."
Kathleen G. Auerbach,PhD, IBCLC (Homewood, IL)- [log in to unmask]
WEB PAGE: http://www.mcs.com/~auerbach/lactation.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2