LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"PHYLLIS J. ADAMSON" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Jul 1996 10:24:26 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Snipped from Margaret's post:
>because "all that closeness was so confining anyway" as she put it.  It's
>hard to understand wanting to be "milked" by a machine versus nursing one's
>infant. But both these women prefer it and give their reasons as efficiency,
>freedom and the "non-animal-like-ness."

This is what I describe as being unable to know there is a difference between
sensual and sexual.  I think some women ideitify these terms as one and the
same.  They are confused between mother-baby sensual bonding and marital
arousal.  This is my Psyc.101 take on why some women like this solution to
"doing what's best for baby" without having to sort out all those confused
physical / emotional feelings.  Throw in intense intimacy, which they also don't
seem to be able to handle, ie "...all that closeness was so confining..."
If they didn't know about pumping & bottle feeding, they would have weaned and
given formula.  In my view, these women could use the help of a good
psychotherapist.  But that would happen only if they saw their own reactions as
a problem and they wanted to resolve it.

Phyllis Adamson, BA, IBCLC
Prvt. Prac. - Glenale, AZ
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2