Does evidence-based practice mean that we have to understand exactly *how*
something works?  Or just that it does, and is supported by reputable
literature?

There's a number of studies listed on the National Center for Homeopathy at
http://www.homeopathic.org/research.htm
They might explain it a little more clearly than I could (I'm not a
homeopath, nor a biochemist).  I have seen homeopathy work amazingly well
for my own family, clients (no, I did not prescribe it), and in animals.

Morgan Kennedy Henderson, IBCLC
Wellesley, MA

On 1/2/03 12:03 AM, "Automatic digest processor"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Date:    Wed, 1 Jan 2003 18:15:20 -0800
> From:    Kate Hallberg <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: lac caninum
>
> with all due respect, how is the diluted (and
> succussed) milk of a dog going to dry up milk?  Please
> explain in terms that this biochemist can understand.
>
>
> kate- jumping in, after discussing this off-list with
> people concerned about evidence based practice

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html