In a message dated 95-12-18 00:13:20 EST, Linda writes:

>From:    Linda Pohl <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: ATTN :Marie Davis  re: Australian activist
>
>Thanks to Anne, I was able to find the post you were looking for.
>Unfortunately, I cannot find your e-mail address now!  Enjoy!  Linda Pohl,
>IBCLC
>
>>From: Cynthia Visness <[log in to unmask]>
>>Subject:      Australian activist
*************SNIP***********************
>>Well, Professor Roger Short, a breastfeeding zealot and FHI Board
>>Member has actually submitted a formal request to the Australian
>>government to require infant formula to carry this warning label on
>>the outside:
>>
>>        Warning: Infant formula is potentially hazardous to the
>>        health of your baby in the first 4-6 months of its life.
******************************SNIP************************************
>I understand his proposal has not been met with favor.  But I guess
>it has been getting attention...
>Cindy Visness
>Family Health International
>[log in to unmask]
********************************snip*************************
Perhaps if it was worded:
                 Caution: Infant formula is potentially a disadvantage
                  to the health of babies in the first 4-6 months of life.

The nonzealots would find it more acceptable and yet it still should command
the attention of the reader.  This wording is still strong yet not as
forcefull as the original wording.

My opinion and 2 cents worth

Jon Ahrendsen MD