LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kathleen G. Auerbach" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Aug 1995 22:57:00 CDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
No question that every breastfeeding is a natural immunization.

In addition, abreastfed baby who is immunized typically generates a higher
response to the immunizing agent and thus has a longer period of higher
protection than occurs in an artificially-fed baby immunized at the same
time.

So, a breastfed baby is clearly more protected than an artificially-fed
baby, even in the absence of medically-generated immunizations.

However, in an imperfect world where disases can still kill, I opt--where
it is possible and the benefits far outweigh the risks--to use that which
science has enabled us to provide. Immunizations is one of those things.




Def. of LC service: "We are all faced with a series of great opportunities
brilliantly disguised as impossible situations."
Kathleen G. Auerbach,PhD, IBCLC - [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2