LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim & Winnie Mading <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:20:53 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
As I continued to think about this issue, another analogy came to
mind.

Suppose you see someone you know leaving a bar late at night
obviously very inebriated.  You try to convince that individual that
it would be better if someone else drove.  He (she) responds, "I've
driven home drunker than this many times and have never had an
accident."  Does this in any way negate our concern for the safety
of both the drinker and the general public on the road at the same
time?  Do you hold back in expressing your concern?  Of course not.
I'm sure that most drunk drivers do manage to get home safely, but I
don't think any of us would argue that that negates the need for
caution.  That individual has a significantly greater liklihood of
being in or causing an accident.  Because individuals in any given
group don't have the outcomes that the group is more prone to
doesn't cancel the odds.  And the odds are definitely on the side of
breastfeeding.
As for me, I will continue to advocate for safe driving and also for
what's best for babies.
Winnie Mading IBCLC

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2