LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nikki Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:25:18 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (84 lines)
 
 
In a message dated 9/26/2005 8:49:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

I don't  think the teaching tool or tactic itself need  be evidence-based.


Dear Colleagues:
    Liz makes a lovely point about belly balls, and  teaching tips that have 
clearly reached mothers and parents, thus increasing  their understanding.
    I wonder about evidence-based teaching practices  though. For 
example,there are studies that show that printed materials don't  make create the 
outcomes we want, i.e. increased breastfeeding duration. Where  is a study that shows 
that printed materials are useful, and create change,  which is the outcome 
of learning?
    This is just one of those studies. I have seen  others, and as usual, 
can't put my finger on them at the moment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------  
         
Evaluation of an information booklet on breastfeeding duration: a  clinical 
trial
 
Journal of Advanced  Nursing
Volume 20 Issue  5 Page 836  - November 1994

Yvonne L. Hauck BScN MSc RN FCNA,  Lecturerand Joan E. Dimmock B AppSc MAppSc 
RN FCNA, Nursing  Consultant   
Since very few tools used in health education are carefully evaluated,  the 
aim of this study was to examine the effect that a breastfeeding  information 
booklet had on breastfeeding behaviour. Feedback about  breastfeeding 
information needs from a preliminary study of 58 Perth  mothers at 3 months postpartum 
provided the basis for the development of  an information booklet. The sample 
consisted of 150 mothers of full-term  infants who were breastfeeding for the 
first time. Upon discharge from  hospital, a random sample of 75 mothers were 
sent the booklet. These  mothers and a control group (n = 75) were surveyed 
for 52 weeks to  compare breastfeeding duration. Although the breastfeeding 
information  booklet was found to be useful by 97% of the experimental group, 
there was  no significant difference noted for breastfeeding duration between  
groups.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    My experience with printed materials in the  home has been that most 
women don't even look through that pile of paper  until weeks after they come home 
with their new baby. And women do get a  PILE of paper: documents about 
paternity, shaken baby syndrome, vaccines,  breastfeeding, infant care, postpartum 
depression. I've seen nurses come in and  hand a pile of papers to a newly 
delivered mother, then leave  her  room. Literacy level is not assessed; the 
nurse isn't even considering the  level of learning or readiness of the learner. 
The nurse is thinking about all  the work that has to be done for this mother, 
and getting her work done. Whether  it is effective or not and teaches this 
mother isn't considered; the nurse's job  is done when she hands the packet over.
    In my work as mother-baby community nurse, the  mother has to sign 7 
pieces of paper as part of my visit. Does she even  look at what she is signing? 
99% of the time not; I give her a brief sentence  about each piece of paper 
("This one is for the insurance billing, this one says  that I have checked you, 
this one says that I have examined your  baby............")    Meanwhile trees 
are cut down and  factories produce tons of reams of paper products, 
contributing to the waste  stream. 
   I know that good videos and good materials make me feel  good as a 
teacher; I wonder about all their effectiveness though, especially  since the most 
recent Ross survey shows that breastfeeding initiation is down 4%  (to 66% in 
2003 from 70% in 2002). 
    In all fairness, the CDC data show an increase:  from 59.3% exclusive at 
7 days in 2001 to 62.5 exclusive at 7 days in 2003. 
    What do you all think?
    warmly,

Nikki Lee RN, MS, Mother of 2, IBCLC, CCE
Maternal-Child Adjunct  Faculty Union Institute and University
Film Reviews Editor, Journal of Human  Lactation
www.breastfeedingalwaysbest.com

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2