LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sarah Barnett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Dec 1997 19:27:48 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
Hi all-
Thank you to everyone who responded to my recent queries.  Now I have
another question- or is it a comment?  When I suggested to the mother
that one of the factors in delayed milk production was a retained
placental fragment she contacted her midwives.  The midwife is sure that
the placenta was delivered intact BUT it doesn't matter because retained
fragments "do not present as delayed lactation".  I have been reading
Lactnet and Ruth Lawrence etc. and * I* know that the midwife needs a
little bit more education.  How would you suggest that I proceed?  I also
needed to rant about this too.  Thanks for listening.

Sarah

Sarah Friend Barnett   LLLL, IBCLC
Bronx (New York City), NY  -  [log in to unmask]
" You are not obliged to finish the task,
 neither are you free to neglect it."       R. Tarfon

ATOM RSS1 RSS2