last I heard, ICDC (which is the international organisation with the 
responsibility for monitoring the Code worldwide) says that companies owned 
by companies which breach the Code should also be considered as Code 
violators. Therefore, Lansinoh should be treated as equivalent to Pigeon.
Karleen Gribble
Australia


--------------------------------------------------
From: "Marianne Vanderveen-Kolkena" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 8:21 PM
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [LACTNET] ILCA and Code Violators

> > Jan, interesting that you mention the Lansinoh/Pigeon-stuff again; I 
> > touched
> that issue in my 'Letter to the Editor', also in JHL Nov. 2009. Liz, you
> didn't address that part of my letter in your response on page 400/401. Is
> there a clear statement on this? Are subsidiaries from code-violators,
> code-violators themselves or are they not...? Any wisdom on that to share
> with us...? ;-)
>
> 

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome