Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 19 May 1997 05:47:14 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>
>> Karen, it is known that nursing during the night produces more prolactin
>> than day-time nursing, so it's quite possible that the night time
>> co-sleeping and nursing helps keep the prolactin levels high and therefore
>> helps keep milk production going.
>>
>Kathy, this makes perfect sense until you factor in the transfer fron
>endocrine to autocrine control. How big a factor is prolactin
>at the six month mark?
>
We need to remember that the endocrine/autocrine distinction is a *theory*
about breast milk production, not a proven fact, and that some studies of
prolactin levels do not show the decrease at 3-4 months -- perhaps because
these are moms who are nursing on cue/demand throughout day and night (third
world mothers). I suspect that at least *some* of the decrease in prolactin
noted in some studies of western women is due to a concerted effort on the
mother's part, even if unconscious, to get the baby onto a 3-4 hour
schedule. Where babies are truly allowed to nurse on demand, they follow a
more physiological pattern for a species with breast milk composition like
ours, of nursing several times an HOUR, around the clock. Among women in
some highland New Guinea tribes, even the 3-4 year olds are nursing several
times an hour, all day long. I am not saying that I don't *believe* the
endocrine/autocrine theory, just that all the evidence is not in yet, and I
think a lot of people don't have a proper respect for the role of culture
(scheduling) in affecting biology.
Katherine A. Dettwyler, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Anthropology and Nutrition
Texas A&M University
|
|
|