LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nina Berry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 May 2007 12:09:13 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Hi all
Of course, I am not really annoyed with Dr Buescher and I can see that
everything he says is accurate.  The difficulty is with communication.
Scientists are notoriously bad at communicating the significance of their
(exciting, fascinating, accurate) knowledge of their very specific areas of
expertise to the bigger picture. I am frustrated because I can see that the
US (even more than here, where at least we have decent initiation rates)
needs a strong consistent public health message - that breastfeeding is
important to human health. I don't think that most people understand that
such a piece is discussing one very limited area of immunobiology - and they
extrapolate (given an ambient culture that is hostile towards breastfeeding
- ar at least more supportive of artificial feeding) that breastfeeding
doesn't matter all that much after all - and that is what gets up my
...um... nose. 

Cheers
Nina Berry BA/Bed(Hons) Dip Arts(Phil)
Breastfeeding Counsellor
PhD Candidate - "Ethical Issues in the marketing of 'Toddler Milks'"

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2