Exactly, Felicia!  About how I feel about many Cochrane reviews
actually..... they way they set their criteria for inclusion of
breastfeeding studies seems to make their results meaningless sometimes...

Pamela Morrison IBCLC
Rustington, England

At 05:00 28/05/2015, you wrote:
>Date:    Wed, 27 May 2015 20:39:12 -0700
>From:    Felicia Henry <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: Speachless
>
>Um . . . since when has a large study size been a problem?!?  I was at an
>area LLL conference and one of the speakers was commenting how she had a
>study she did and was told that since there was 'only' 24 moms it was too
>small to get any useful info.  Most concrane (okay spelled totally wrong I
>hope you know what I mean) have thousands.  So this seems like I don't like
>the results so I will make up reasons it has to be wrong.
>
>
>
>Felicia L Henry, BCCE, IBCLC
>
>Oxnard, CA


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome