LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:07:13 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (68 lines)
Pamela, now in the UK, writes:


>  However, one of my specialties was working with low weight gain or 
>failure to thrive babies, and - for me - a baby's weights, from 
>birth, always tell a story.  If the primary purpose of breastfeeding 
>is to feed the baby, and if a baby fails to gain roughly 30g per day 
>from about Day 3 and for the first 3 months of life, then it is a 
>sign that something is not quite right with the breastfeeding, that 
>intake is inadequate for some reason, and the quicker the cause is 
>discovered, addressed and remedied, the easier it is to preserve 
>breastfeeding.


I certainly agree that  spotting under-nutrition is important, and 
that fixing it can mean breastfeeding lasts longer. But  I am still 
looking for anything that shows us that 'if a baby fails to gain 
roughly 30g per day from about Day 3 and for the first 3 months of 
life then it is a sign that something is not quite right with the 
breastfeeding, that intake is inadequate for some reason'.

This seems to me to be very specific, Pamela - even allowing for your 
'roughly' - and while a baby gaining this amount is almost certainly 
perfectly adequately nourished, is it not possible that a baby may 
gain less than this and still be ok - and just physiologically small? 
How do we know that this very specific figure is correct for babies 
in general?  How do the WHO charts for normally-feeding babies 
translate into weight gain per day/week/month? Has anyone done the 
maths on this?

I am not being provocative, truly - I just don't know how we know 
enough about normal, healthy weight gain in excl bf babies *across 
the spectrum* to  be able to have something as definite as this, so 
definite that you say a baby failing to fit this pattern is, per se, 
not adequately nourished.


It's also not what mothers are routinely told in the UK  - not that I 
am saying what mothers are routinely told has got to be correct! But 
if you do practise here, you may find yourself in conflict with 
mothers' other sources of info on this specific point.  I don't think 
what mothers are sometimes told here - that a weight gain needs to be 
something averaging out at between 4-8 ounces a week, sometimes 
(inaccurately) translated as  100g -250 g -  is soundly 
evidence-based....but they are definitely not looking for 30g a day.

And as ever - successful breastfeeding is not just about the ounces, is it?  :)

Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc,  tutor, UK




-- 
http://www.heatherwelford.co.uk

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2