LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim & Winnie Mading <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 30 Dec 2000 10:15:48 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I am several digests behind in reading Lactnet, so this may have
been addressed already.  I went to the site and read the question
carefully several times.  They ask if it is wrong for a mother to
nurse past two years and 75% say "no" as opposed to 75% saying it is
wrong to nurse past 2 years!  This is a good example of how the
wording of a question can skew the results.  If we, the experts.
read it wrong, how many lay people read it correctly?  I guess we
shouldn't complain, since if people do read it wrong, maybe the
support isn't as high as 75%.
Winnie Mading RNC, IBCLC

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2