LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Judy K. Dunlap, RNC, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 25 Nov 1995 06:27:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Eileen Martell wrote:

>3.      Re:  Judy Dunlap (Re; nipple stimulation) mentioned (23/11/95)
>oxytocin
>continues to be released throughout feed, multiple times... without this
>...breasts won't empty completely.
>Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the breasts are never completely
empty.
>If we lead mothers to think this then many will believe they don't have
>enough
>milk to feed their babies.  Carification please.

You're right, of course, but with this group of readers, I figured the intent
of my question would be clear--that is, would enough milk be removed from the
breast at each feeding to stimulate adequate ongoing production.  I don't use
that terminology with moms if I have my wits about me (which is iffy, I
admit, sometimes <G>), and in fact, twice this past week, to correct that
misconception,  used the analogy that somebody offered here on Lactnet, of
the sink filling, then emptying when the plug is removed, while the faucet
runs continuously.  Thanks for pointing that out as a potential problem if
used with clients.

Judy Dunlap, RNC, IBCLC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2